<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t buy now: Save 100 percent</title>
	<link>http://stevensande.com/habitofwonder/2005/08/06/dont-buy-now-save-100-percent/</link>
	<description>Moments in an imaginary age</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Hannah Robbins</title>
		<link>http://stevensande.com/habitofwonder/2005/08/06/dont-buy-now-save-100-percent/#comment-34</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:17:40 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevensande.com/habitofwonder/2005/08/06/dont-buy-now-save-100-percent/#comment-34</guid>
					<description>The power of negative auxillary verbs.  'They' say that if you are planning to go on a diet, not to tell yourself &quot;don't eat chocolate&quot; because invariably, you will.  I am slightly surprised that it as taken those sly marketing communications folks this long to try such a strategy.  Also useful knowledge for parenting, so I hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The power of negative auxillary verbs.  &#8216;They&#8217; say that if you are planning to go on a diet, not to tell yourself &#8220;don&#8217;t eat chocolate&#8221; because invariably, you will.  I am slightly surprised that it as taken those sly marketing communications folks this long to try such a strategy.  Also useful knowledge for parenting, so I hear.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steven Sande</title>
		<link>http://stevensande.com/habitofwonder/2005/08/06/dont-buy-now-save-100-percent/#comment-35</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:44:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://stevensande.com/habitofwonder/2005/08/06/dont-buy-now-save-100-percent/#comment-35</guid>
					<description>Makes me think of the allegedly &quot;brandless&quot; brands like American Apparel coming on to the market, marketed at the marketing-weary. They should win points for being anti-sweatshop, but I expect them to encounter resistance on the marketing front; it feels too planned to carry off any claim to brandlessness. I think of craigslist as a better example, because its beginnings seem more random.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Makes me think of the allegedly &#8220;brandless&#8221; brands like American Apparel coming on to the market, marketed at the marketing-weary. They should win points for being anti-sweatshop, but I expect them to encounter resistance on the marketing front; it feels too planned to carry off any claim to brandlessness. I think of craigslist as a better example, because its beginnings seem more random.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
